OP is vegan and their wife is a pescetarian. They share a 5-year-old son with a meat-eating ex-partner. The son stays for a week at each house and eats vegan food when with OP, fish when with OP’s wife, and meat and potatoes when with OP’s ex-partner.
Their Son Is Unhappy With The Food
Recently, the son has been complaining about the food at the ex-partner’s house, which has led to an argument between OP and their ex-partner.
You’ve Malnourished Him on Purpose
The ex-partner believes that the vegan food at OP’s house is not providing enough nutrients for their son and that OP has intentionally malnourished him.
He Has Balanced Meals
OP disagrees and points out that their son has well-balanced meals at their house.
She’s Threatening Court
The ex-partner has threatened to take OP to court and demand full custody if they do not stop “forcing their beliefs” on their son. OP suggests that the ex-partner should simply make more vegetables and less meat for their son, but the ex-partner objects, saying that OP should not tell them how to parent their child.
Basically, They Disagree About the Diet
Overall, the situation is a disagreement between OP and their ex-partner over the diet of their shared son.
It’s a Strange & Complicated Situation
Fail to prepare, then prepare to fail. The famous line strikes a chord with this strange and complicated situation.
“NTA and start prepping the information you need for the inevitable court hearing or mediation, like the nutritional content of the meals you are making and a diary of those meals. She doesn’t have a leg to stand on.”
Prepare Your Facts for the Court
This is some excellent legal advice that may have well have come from a lawyer. Preparing the information in advance will allow OP to ensure that any issue in court can be met by cold hard facts.
OP Needs to Gain Control of the Situation
Clearly, the OP has no ill intentions with his child. Therefore, it is critical that OP gains some form of control over the situation before he is irrationally taken through the judicial system because of the diet he follows.
It’s Strange Anger From OP’s Ex-partner
There are many that suspect that this strange anger from OP’s partner is anger for different reasons. Her attempts at causing an issue are totally unfounded.
She’s Ignorant About Nutrition
“Your ex, however, is very ignorant of how nutrition works. Your son is living the best of both worlds where he is getting access to all kinds of diets and food from two different households.
If anything, it’s maybe because the food at your place is more delicious, lol.”
There Will Be Minimal Nutritional Differences
Firstly, it is evident that OP’s ex-partner does not know what they are talking about. Pescatarians pretty much just add fish to an essentially vegan diet. Therefore, it is likely that the nutritional differences between the two diets are minimal at best.
It Seems Totally Ridiculous
It appears as if OP had been a vegan before their relationship broke down. Therefore, the problem their ex-partner is now having with the diet now seems totally ridiculous.
Maybe They Are Envious
The writer of this comment makes a good point that the ex-partner may just be envious of the OP and the time they spend with their child. Perhaps these motives have persuaded the ex to take drastic action to try and keep the child for themselves.
It’s Hypocritical
Many online users have pointed out the hypocrisy of what the ex-partner is saying.
“Nta…she says you are forcing your choice of food on your kid, but so is she. The kid is actually asking for veggies. I know enough kids who would gladly give away their greens.”
There Are No Grounds to Take Him to Court
She follows a pescatarian diet which is effectively the same in terms of forcing a lifestyle on their child. In doing so, they are effectively saying they are just as bad as the OP. Therefore, she has no grounds for taking him to court.
The Kids Asking for Veggies!
The child has also indicated that they want more green vegetables, which is a sign that most parents would be proud of. It is bizarre to the thread participants the way that OP’s ex can act and think they have any ground for a court hearing.
HIS HOA DEMANDS THE REMOVAL OF SECURITY CAMERAS: THEIR OVERSIGHT TRIGGERS A LEGAL BACKLASH, ENTRAPPING THEM IN A RIDICULOUSLY EXPENSIVE LOOPHOLE!
A couple bought surveillance cameras to monitor their property, which inadvertently waged a costly war with their HOA.
She Demands Her Brother Share His Daughter’s Inheritance With Her Stepdaughter – Who Wasn’t Bequeathed Anything!
When it comes to family dynamics, few things can stir up emotions, quite like inheritance disputes. A contentious situation has emerged in an unfolding saga that tests the bonds of blood and challenges the concept of fairness. At the center of this narrative stands a sister who adamantly demands her brother to share his daughter’s inheritance with her stepdaughter, who, to her dismay, was not bequeathed anything.
HE ISSUES AN ULTIMATUM: IN-LAWS MUST VACATE OR HIS DAUGHTER’S DOOR REMAINS LOCKED IN A HEART-WRENCHING POWER STRUGGLE
OP’s brother-in-law, Sammy, moved in with his twin daughters, Olivia and Sloane, after losing his home due to a divorce. OP’s daughter, Zoey, is 16 years old and gets along fine with her cousins, but they do not respect her privacy.