Are we ready to face an impending future where the boundaries of legality could drastically shift? This captivating query has undeniably been generating substantial buzz across the online sphere. The responses gaining the most upvotes are poised to evoke a sense of curiosity that beckons exploration. It’s genuinely worth delving into the comprehensive and meticulous answers provided in response to a Reddit user’s question: “What currently legal thing do you expect to be illegal in the next 20 years?”
Family Vlog YouTube Channels
Among the restless contributors, a voice emerged, declaring, “Hopefully, those family channels on Youtube.” This sentiment found resonance in another user’s affirmation: “Ryan’s Toys is the well-known one. It’s where the parents exploit their children by making them do product placement will all these toys for youtube. But you don’t see familial interaction; it’s all a plasticky gimmick.” Amidst the chorus of opinions, a frustrated parent said, “My kid watches A for Adley and Rebecca Zamolo. Decorate your houses! It’s too {darn} loud. Hate the {darn} echo.” Echoing the sentiment, another individual concurred, targeting content that involves “yelling in public for no real reason and are making simple things so needlessly complex.”
Child Marriage
The contentious issue of child marriage drew attention, with one user succinctly noting, “Child marriage.” The conversation gained depth as another contributor noted: “Depends on the state. A surprising number of states allow 16-year-olds to get married with parental consent.” Expressing a poignant perspective, another voice lamented, “Sadly, some cultures don’t share the same ideals. In some countries, kids get traded for money, land, animals, and houses. The sad but harsh reality of this cruel world!” This discourse sheds light on the complexities of societal norms and the profound impact of cultural disparities on the lives of young individuals.
Subscription Services
A user’s narrative unfolded within the Reddit community: “Subscription services for certain product features. It’s ridiculous that one requires a sub-service to use the key fob for their car.” Echoing this sentiment, another participant shared their experience: “My LC500 had this. What a crock of ****. I got it all done aftermarket. I’m not paying Lexus a subscription fee to start my car remotely.” A distinct perspective emerged, highlighting industry practices: “BMW excels at this kind of {junk}. Up until four years, they had plans to charge a yearly quota to use CarPlay. They abruptly changed their plans when they discovered no other manufacturer was tagging along.” The conversation became a broader concern: “This {stuff} is why the right to repair stuff is so important.”
Online Tracking
The intriguing topic of potential legal transitions in the next two decades encompassed online tracking. Oli candidly pondered why it hasn’t been deemed illegal: “If I follow someone in real life and write down everything they do, I will get arrested, but Google can do exactly this with no problems?” Alex said that Google’s latitude stems from users engaging with their services. In the discussion, another voice stressed the role of user consent, pointing out that agreeing to terms and conditions, as seen in social media use, places the decision partially in the user’s hands. The discourse underlines the nuanced interplay between privacy, digital services, and individual choices.
Spam Calls
The vexing issue of unsolicited calls found a passionate voice: “We’re trying to reach you about your car’s extended warranty…” This user’s sentiment resonates widely, sparking a call for the complete dissolution of the cell-spam industry, encompassing scam calls and intrusive political SMS messages. The complexity of this issue emerges as another user astutely observed: “It’s a red queen’s race, however. So you ban them. Now they’re in another country. So you ban their numbers. Now they obtain a list of valid numbers and spoof them. So you block them. Now they move on to the next one.” The perpetual cat-and-mouse game they play highlights the agility and determination of these entities to persist despite attempts at eradication.
Single-Use Plastic
The issue of Single-Use Plastic caught the attention of Candor, succinctly putting forth “single-use plastic.” This sentiment found solidarity with another user, advocating for the obligatory implementation of store refilling stations. Their visionary proposal unfolded: “Imagine this: you need milk, so take your milk jug to the store and fill it using a filling station, then check out and take it home. Need soap? Take your jug to be filled. Do you want to buy 5 lbs of rice? Fill and weigh a bag. Most packaging is to get the object from the store to our homes.” This innovative perspective resonates, fostering contemplation about our pervasive packaging habits.
Marketing Smoke Sticks
Selling cigarettes has sparked a noteworthy conversation, mainly spurred by New Zealand’s unconventional approach: “New Zealand has made it illegal to sell cigarettes to anyone born after 2008, even once they’re adults.” This novel initiative has ignited speculation that other regions might adopt similar measures. The query of Prohibition’s efficacy is raised with a historical lens, invoking the sentiment, “Prohibition? Historically, it worked wonders.” This acknowledgment is coupled with the collective hope that New Zealand’s bold stance could inspire other nations to pursue analogous paths.
Skipping Ads
Skipping ads, a prevalent habit among online users, has spurred contrasting opinions. A user contends that while legally permissible, it ought to be prohibited. In a thought-provoking twist, another voice suggests, “Skipping ads is the only thing companies want to be illegal because it will work in their favor, so it’s the one I expect to happen.” This perspective underscores the potential symbiotic relationship between advertisers and regulations, inviting contemplation on the evolution of consumer interaction with digital content.
Fireworks
The subject of fireworks has ignited strong views, with Tygo in Europe advocating for a ban: “People here toss it to bystanders, so it’s not safe, to be honest.” Legality takes center stage, as a commenter named Nato highlighted the stringent regulations in Germany, where usage, purchase, and sale without approval is prohibited, barring a brief window around New Year’s. This discourse raises the question of balancing tradition with safety concerns, underscoring the nuanced perspective surrounding fireworks’ role in society.
Telemarketing
Telemarketing, as Colin pointed out, might be the prime candidate for transformation. His brief response, “Telemarketing,” resonates with clarity. Further delving into his viewpoint, he expounded, “Make robo-dialing illegal, and require that insurance companies, banks, etc. give people an option to talk to a human in the initial menu. Lots of people would prefer that.” The trajectory of telemarketing is a subject that warrants contemplation, given its potential impact on personal preferences and experiences.
Subscription Services
Subscription Services, an increasingly pervasive trend, drew criticism from a user who expressed bewilderment: “I find it absurd that a subscription service is necessary to use the key fob for your car, despite it being a feature of the product.” This sentiment resonated, as evidenced by a car dealership employee recounting a customer conversation. The individual had purchased a new car for their daughter and desired a remote start feature. The dealership employee’s advice proved invaluable, highlighting that opting for an aftermarket solution was more prudent due to the manufacturer’s imposition of a yearly fee after six months. This discourse underscores the financial implications and questionable ethics of such subscription models.
Data Privacy
A paramount concern in our digital era received sharp focus when a user pointedly noted “data privacy violations.” However, Jean astutely introduced a geographical perspective, highlighting the disparity based on location. The efficacy of Europe’s GDPR surfaced in this context, deemed by many as commendable. Contrarily, Jim contested this, highlighting the evolving landscape where opting into tracking and data harvesting has become a labyrinthine task with monumental “accept all” buttons. He asserted that data collection beyond access logs necessitates informed consent. If this dismantles certain enterprises reliant on privacy infringements, it’s a warranted consequence: “If you can’t exist without privacy violations, you shouldn’t exist.” This discourse spotlights the dichotomy between personal data rights and the business landscape.
Beauty Contest
Beauty contests, notably those involving underage participants, sparked a thought-provoking observation from Suven: “Beauty contests featuring underage contestants.” This sentiment resonated with several users, confirming that such events warrant reconsideration. Another contributor poignantly questioned the rationale: “Let’s all gather to look at the body of children and decide who’s the most beautiful. Who thought that was a good idea?” This critique invites introspection about the appropriateness of these contests in today’s societal context.
Microtransactions
A contentious issue in gaming spurred a user’s insightful perspective. Their assertion that games accessible to youngsters should steer clear of microtransactions is compelling. The rationale behind this is clear: children often lack the restraint necessary to manage such purchases, creating potential distress for parents burdened with unexpected expenses. Amidst the discussion, humor abounds as participants jest about the vexation of being outplayed by “11-year-olds” in Warzone, offering a light-hearted glimpse into the frustrations surrounding this digital landscape.
Multi-Level Marketing
Multi-Level Marketing, aptly highlighted by Miss Galifrey, emerges as a subject worth examining critically. An additional observation points to the disheartening reality that specific charitable organizations have also embraced MLM structures. An example raised is Autism Speaks, which, for this individual, ignites an intense emotional reaction. As a person living with autism, he finds their practices abhorrent. What initially commenced as a noble effort to assist their child’s needs ultimately morphed into an insatiable pursuit of profit. The founder’s shifting perspectives exacerbated the disillusionment felt within the autism community.
16 ANNOYING PHRASES THAT MAKE PEOPLE IMMEDIATELY HATE YOU!
We wanted to know the most irksome things someone can say that turns you off! These Reddit users didn’t hold back! 16 ANNOYING PHRASES THAT MAKE PEOPLE IMMEDIATELY HATE YOU!
OBSOLETE MILLENNIALS: 14 SKILLS THEY LEARNED IN THE 90S THAT HAVE NO PLACE IN TODAY’S WORLD
A lot has changed since the turn of the century – just ask this nostalgic lot!
OBSOLETE MILLENNIALS: 14 SKILLS THEY LEARNED IN THE 90S THAT HAVE NO PLACE IN TODAY’S WORLD
THE FALL FROM GRACE: 12 PROFESSIONS THAT WERE ONCE REVERED, NOW A TOTAL JOKE
These 12 professions that are now obsolete show how much the times have changed.
THE FALL FROM GRACE: 12 PROFESSIONS THAT WERE ONCE REVERED, NOW A TOTAL JOKE
FROM ‘OKAY BOOMER’ TO ‘UGH BOOMER’: 10 HABITS THAT IRRITATE MILLENNIALS
Each generation has its quirks. Most label it as an “old person thing” when asked why grandpa or grandma does something unusual. The defense from the other side is that “it was the way things were back in our day.”
FROM ‘OKAY BOOMER’ TO ‘UGH BOOMER’: 10 HABITS THAT IRRITATE MILLENNIALS