In this situation, the writer and their wife disagree about the safety of a meal prepared for their children. The writer believes the chicken she made is undercooked and a potential health hazard. In contrast, the wife thinks it’s OK to eat.
Image Credit: Shutterstock.
The disagreement resulted in the writer making a different meal for the children and the wife not talking to the writer.
From the information given, both parties have valid concerns. The writer is worried about the safety of their children and wants to prevent food poisoning.
At the same time, the wife is confident in her cooking and doesn’t want her efforts dismissed. However, how they communicated and dealt with the situation could have been better handled.
In such situations, it’s crucial to have a calm and respectful discussion, avoiding accusations and personal attacks. For example, the writer could have approached the problem by saying, “I understand that you believe the chicken is safe to eat, but I’m still concerned. Can we check the temperature to make sure it’s fully cooked?”
The couple isn’t great at conflict resolution, and it didn’t need to be a case of either eating the raw chicken or going to make a whole other dinner. Instead, they could have put the chicken back into the oven to cook through.
“Why didn’t you just put the chicken back in the oven ?!” – one Redditor commented. This way, her efforts wouldn’t have been wasted, nor would the kids have to eat potentially harmful foods. A chef chimed in on the matter, “I work in a restaurant kitchen. We would never serve pink chicken, and without a thermometer, you can’t tell the internal temperature. I would have put it back in the oven.” So even chefs wouldn’t eat raw chicken.
On the other hand, the wife could have listened to the writer’s concerns and not taken it as a personal attack on her cooking.
As for the question of who is in the wrong, it’s difficult to say based on the limited information provided. Both parties have contributed to the conflict, but focusing on finding a solution and resolving the issue is essential rather than assigning blame.
The woman lost her temper quickly, indicating it wasn’t just this particular argument that led to her irritation. One comment says- “When a spouse says, “then you do it” in an exasperated tone, 9/10, it’s because they think their spouse isn’t pulling their weight and is p****d at being corrected for that very reason.” So it seems like there are more significant issues at hand here.
In a nutshell, “The pink chicken is not the issue here!!!” as one comment puts it. The argument centers more around the dynamic between the couple and the division of chores rather than this one dinner.
Couples need open and respectful communication, especially regarding their children’s health and well-being. Taking a step back, calming down, and trying to understand each other’s perspective can go a long way in resolving conflicts.
Source: Reddit
